this is and isn't about behavioural science and policy
A message of real inspiration on the Lord's day. Thanks SK!
"I especially agree with "(*klaxon sounds*)" (Kelly, 2025)." (Beirne, 2025)
much love
This was a treat of a post, having recently read Systemantics.
> But they have a weakness. It’s the person who can be hit with the pressure to conform to that consensus and think… ‘so what’.
My impression is that the challenge lies in achieving dissent without causing schisms.
As always, thanks for your writtings!
The complex systems stuff is a reference to the book systemantics, in case people don't know https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics
Many people (myself included) are not ready for this conversation. I suspect there is a huge cost involved in being an agentic individual.
A message of real inspiration on the Lord's day. Thanks SK!
"I especially agree with "(*klaxon sounds*)" (Kelly, 2025)." (Beirne, 2025)
much love
This was a treat of a post, having recently read Systemantics.
> But they have a weakness. It’s the person who can be hit with the pressure to conform to that consensus and think… ‘so what’.
My impression is that the challenge lies in achieving dissent without causing schisms.
As always, thanks for your writtings!
The complex systems stuff is a reference to the book systemantics, in case people don't know https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemantics
Many people (myself included) are not ready for this conversation. I suspect there is a huge cost involved in being an agentic individual.